第一篇：GRE考生证件要求

NEEA/PROMETRIC REGIONAL REGISTRATION CENTER

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Tel.: 86-10-62799911

Fax: 86-10-82520243

TO:

FAX NO.:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

杨健(Yang Jian)2010-11-05 15:32 GRE Split exam Registration Confirmation

You are now registered to take the GRE Split exam in Xiamen.Test Date:Test Time: 2011-03-17 13:00

Confirmation No.:Test Center: ***7 8523

You must arrive at least 30 minutes prior to the testing time to allow for the check-in process and orientation.You will need to bring your confirmation number and two forms of photo-bearing identification with you on the day of the exam;at least one form of primary ID is required.Acceptable forms of primary identification in China are passport, citizenship ID(provisional citizenship ID is not acceptable)or military ID.The test administrator may also ask you to present a secondary form of identification;Secondary forms of Identification are driver license, student ID or employee ID.Identification must meet ETS-GRE requirements or you will not be permitted to test.Additional information on identification requirements can be found on Page 10 of the GRE information Bulletin.The test center in Xiamen is located at:

Address: Room101,Jijin Building,Xia Men University,Xiamen Fujian

P.R.China

第二篇：2018年5月托福网考考生须知——证件要求

三立教育www. 2018年5月托福网考考生须知——证件要求

参加托福考试，同学们需要携带相关的证件，具体的ETS要求携带的证件有哪些呢?三立教育为大家整理了详细的内容，供大家参考。

考场按TOEFL要求严格审核身份证件。考生如未携带ETS要求提供的证件或携带证件不符合要求，将被拒绝进入考场，考费不予退还，考生须仔细阅读并了解TOEFL网考考生手册(中国版)中关于证件要求的部分。如有证件相关疑问，请在考试日期前与托福报名咨询中心联系。

中国大陆TOEFL考场对身份证件的要求：

中国大陆的考生必须携带有效的二代居民身份证原件参加考试。根据中华人民共和国相关法律，任何年龄的公民，均可在户籍所在地申领居民身份证。

台湾地区考生必须携带有效的台湾地区居民往来大陆通行证原件参加考试。

香港和澳门地区的考生必须携带有效的身份证或护照原件参加考试。

非中国籍考生必须携带有效护照原件参加考试，护照明确显示考生的姓名、照片和签字。

注意：证件上的姓名和生日等个人信息必须与报名信息完全一致。

以上就是为大家整理的“2018年5月托福网考考生须知——证件要求 ”。

第三篇：GRE

The speaker claims that all observation is subjective---colored by desire and expectation, while it would be tempting to concede that we all see things differently, careful scrutiny of the speaker‟s claim reveals that it confused把。。混同 observation with interpretation.In fact , in the end the speaker‟s claim relies entirely on the further claim that there is no such thing as truth and that we cannot truly know anything.While this notion might appeal to certain existentialists存在主义者 and epistemologists认知论主义者, it runs against the grain of all scientific discovery and knowledge gained over the last 500 years.It would be tempting to afford 提供给予the speaker‟s claim greater merit than it deserves.after all , our everyday experience as humans inform us that we often disagree about what we observe around us.we „ve all uttered说 and heard uttered many times the phase”that is not the way I see it!” indeed, everyday observations---for example, about whether a football palyer was out of bounds, or about which car involved in an accident ran the red light---vary depending not only on one‟s spatial空间的 perspective but also one‟s expectations or desires.If I „m rooting for one football team, or if the player is well-known for his ability to make great plays while barely staying in bounds, my desires or expectations might influence what I think I observe.Or if I am driving one of the cars in the accident, or if one car is a souped-up sports car, then my desires or expectations will in all likelihood 可能，可能性color my perception感知（能力），观点 of the accident‟s events.However, these sorts of subjective ”observations” are actually subjective ”interpretations” of what we observe.Visitors to an art museum might disagree about the beauty of a particular work, or even about which color predominates占支配地位 in that work.In a court trial 法庭审判several jurors陪审员 might view the same videotape evidence many times, yet some jurors might “observe” an incidence of police brutality无情野蛮, while others “observe” the appropriate use of force to restrain a dangerous inpidual.Thus ,when it comes to making judgments做出判断 about what we observe and about remembering what we observe, each person‟s inpidual perspective, values, and even emotions help form these judgments and recollections回忆.It is crucial to distinguish between interpretations such as these and observation, which is nothing more than a sensory experience感受的经历.Given the same spatial perspective 空间感and sensory acuity感觉的敏锐 and awareness, it seems to me that our observations would all be essentially本质上 in accord一致---that is , observation can be objective.Lending credence to my position is Francis Bacon‟s scientific method, according to which we can know only that which we observe , and thus all truth must be based on empirical observation.This profoundly important principle serves to expose and strip away 脱去all subjective interpretation of observation, thereby revealing objective scientific truths.For example, up until Bacon‟s time the Earth observed to be at the center of the universe, in accordance with the prevailing religious notion that man was the center of the God‟s creation.Applying Bacon‟s scientific method Galileo expose the biased nature of this claim.Similarly, before Einstein time and space were assumed to be linear, in accordance with our”observation” Einstein‟s mathematical formulas suggested otherwise, and his theories have been proven empirically to be true.Thus , it was our subjective interpretation of the time and space that led to our misguided notions about them.Einstein, like history‟s other most influential scientists, simply refused to accept conventional interpretation of what we all observe.In sum, the speaker confuses observation with interpretation and recollection回忆.It is how we make sense of what we observe, not observation itself, that is colored by our perspective,expectations, and desires.the gifted inpiduals who can set aside their subjectivity and delve深入探究 deeper into empirical evidence, employing Bacon‟s scientific method, are the ones who reveal that observation not only can be objective but must be objective if we are to embrace接受 the more fundamental notion that knowledge and truth exist.认知能力是指人脑加工、储存和提取信息的能力,即人们对事物的构成、性能与他物的关系、发展的动力、发展方向以及基本规律的把握能力。它是人们成功的完成活动最重要的心理条件。知觉、记忆、注意、思维和想象的能力都被认为是认知能力。

理性VS感性

The speaker asserts that society should place more emphasis on intellect and cognition.While the speaker might overlook the benefits of nurturing certain emotions and feelings, on balance I agree that it is by way of our heads rather than our hearts that we can best ensure the well-being of our society.I concede that undue emphasis on cultivating the intellect at the expense of healthy emotions can harm an inpidual psychologically.Undue suppression of legitimate and healthy desires and emotions can result in depression, dysfunction机能障碍，机能失调, and even physical illness.In fact , the intellect can mask such problems thereby exacerbating使恶化使加重 them.To the extent they occur on a mass scale these problems become societal ones-----lowering our economic productivity, burdening our health-care and social-welfare systems, and so forth等等.I also concede that by encouraging and cultivating certain positive emotions and feelings---such as compassion同情 and empathy同感共鸣---society clearly stands to benefit.In many other respects, however, emphasizing emotions and de-emphasizing intellect can carry negative , even dangerous, consequences for any society.Our collective sense of fairness , equity, and justice can easily give way to base instincts like hate, greed, and lust欲望 for power and domination.Thus, on balance any society is better off生活更好 quelling镇压，制止 or at least tempering these sorts of instincts, by nurturing reason, judgment, tolerance, fairness, and understanding—all of which are products of the intellect.The empirical evidence supporting this position is overwhelming;yet one need look no further than a televison set.Most of us have been witness to the current trend in trashy 无价值的talk shows, which eschew回避 anything approaching intellectual discourse论文演说讲道 in favor of pandering迎合 to our baser urges 强烈的愿望and instincts---like jealousy妒忌,lust , and hate.Episodes片段 often devolve into anti-social, sometimes violent, behavior on the part of就。。而言 paticipants and observers alike.And any ostensible假装的”lesson learned”from such shows hardly justify the anti-social outbursts爆发 that the producers and audiences of these shows hope for.The danger of a de-emphasis on intellect are too evident in contemporary America.The incidence of hate crimes is increasing at a startling令人震惊的 rate;gang warfare is at an all-time high;the level of distrust between African Americans and white America seems to be growing.Moreover, taken to an extreme and on a mass scale, appeal to the emotions rather than the intellect has resulted in humanity‟s most horrific atrocities暴行，邪恶,like the Jewish犹太人 holocaust大屠杀, as well as in nearly every holy神圣的 war ever waged throughout history.Indeed, suppressing reason is how demagogues煽动者 and despots专制君主，专制者，暴君 gain and hold their power over their citizen-victims.In contrast, reason and better judgment are effective deterrents制止物 to despotism专制统治, demagoguery, and especially to war.Those opposed to the speaker‟s position might argue that stressing cognition and intellect at the expense of emotion and feeling would have a chilling effect on artistic creativity, which would work a harm to the society.However , even in the arts students must learn theories and techniques, which they then apply to their craft---whether it be music performance , dance , or acting, and creative writing requires the cognitive ability to understand how language is used and how to best communicate ideas.Besides , creative ability is itself partly a function o f intellect;that is ,creative expression is a marriage between cognitive ability and the expression of feelings and emotions.In sum, emotions and feelings can serve as important catalysts催化剂 for compassion and for creativity, yet behaviors that are most harmful to any society are also born of emotions and feelings, which the intellect can serve to override压倒.The inescapable conclusion, then, is that the speaker is fundamentally correct.

第四篇：美国大学对GRE的要求

美国知名大学对GMAT和GRE基本要求，奖学金申请来源： 高勇的日志

相关日志浏览：

美国大学研究生申请全过程（时间进程参考表）

新GRE考试2011年登陆中国：考试结构，题型，流程分析

高勇 发表日志 2010年3月6日托福写作考题看必备参考书

注意：

1.申请美国研究生课程，单凭托福成绩是远远不够滴，除非你本科阶段有超级本领;GRE成绩是必要条件，美国大学里理论上接受雅思成绩，而实际操作中看的是GRE/GMAT;

2.你的论文，研究能力，名人的推荐和是否参加过该校的活动；

3.美国人特别看重学生的综合能力，所以在向大学询问时，不能光谈及你的成绩有多高，要把自己最独特的一面展示给人家；你的自愿者经历、演讲和辩论才能、模拟国际会议、摄影、舞蹈，体育等；千万不要用模板在做你的PS；

Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGRE: 1350GMAT:720

Stanford University(CA)GRE: 1350GMAT:720 University of California–BerkeleyGRE: 1350GMAT:707 Georgia Institute of TechnologyGRE: 1350GMAT:720

University of